<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Fight Is On: Antiwar Counter-Surge vs. Obama War &#38; Escalation by Frederick Ziencina</title>
		<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=164#comment-193637</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=164#comment-193637</guid>
					<description>1 impartial voice on Fox news in the Tv show. He features a seriously hard immigration coverage. They managed to graduate around the Harvard College. Today he possesses their a single Airwaves Show. He couldn't like the America leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 impartial voice on Fox news in the Tv show. He features a seriously hard immigration coverage. They managed to graduate around the Harvard College. Today he possesses their a single Airwaves Show. He couldn&#8217;t like the America leader.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on War as Politics by Violent Means by Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=167#comment-185043</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=167#comment-185043</guid>
					<description>Hello.  On this subject, I wanted to bring it to your attention that We Are Change Chicago is holding a protest/march to provide a time and space for people to express their grievances against the Obama Administration, their actions and policies.  This event will start January 23rd at Millennium Park in downtown Chicago at 2:00.  For more information, please see: http://www.meetup.com/wearechangechicago/calendar/12259258/

Or check out the facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=255863682367&#38;index=1

Spread the word!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.  On this subject, I wanted to bring it to your attention that We Are Change Chicago is holding a protest/march to provide a time and space for people to express their grievances against the Obama Administration, their actions and policies.  This event will start January 23rd at Millennium Park in downtown Chicago at 2:00.  For more information, please see: <a href="http://www.meetup.com/wearechangechicago/calendar/12259258/" rel="nofollow">http://www.meetup.com/wearechangechicago/calendar/12259258/</a></p>
<p>Or check out the facebook page: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=255863682367&amp;index=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=255863682367&amp;index=1</a></p>
<p>Spread the word!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peace is Possible in Iraq: by mike fagan</title>
		<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=69#comment-183098</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=69#comment-183098</guid>
					<description>Bomb blasts across Baghdad kill at least 127. This happened Tuesday, December 8, 2009. Until Congress admits it's errors in voting for the war in Iraq that headlined the tremendously destructive Shock and Awe treatment of lt's citizens and results in the carnage that still takes place,nothing good will take place there. A formal apology by the yea voting members of Congress is the only thing that will eventually calm the storm there. Congress will never do this on its own. The anti-war movement must focus on this,getting a formal apology from our government for the almost 8 yrs of occupation in Iraq.Everyone in the anti-war movement, if your Congress person voted for the Iraq War Resolution, contact that person and demand a formal apology that led to 127 deaths by bombers yesterday. Iraqis believe that Americans must be for the chaos because it has gone on so long and that we have the capacity to stop it, and are unwilling to do so. Americans arn't even focused on Iraq. They don't see the connection between themselves and what their government does. Contact your Congress person today. mike, member of noac  see noac home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bomb blasts across Baghdad kill at least 127. This happened Tuesday, December 8, 2009. Until Congress admits it&#8217;s errors in voting for the war in Iraq that headlined the tremendously destructive Shock and Awe treatment of lt&#8217;s citizens and results in the carnage that still takes place,nothing good will take place there. A formal apology by the yea voting members of Congress is the only thing that will eventually calm the storm there. Congress will never do this on its own. The anti-war movement must focus on this,getting a formal apology from our government for the almost 8 yrs of occupation in Iraq.Everyone in the anti-war movement, if your Congress person voted for the Iraq War Resolution, contact that person and demand a formal apology that led to 127 deaths by bombers yesterday. Iraqis believe that Americans must be for the chaos because it has gone on so long and that we have the capacity to stop it, and are unwilling to do so. Americans arn&#8217;t even focused on Iraq. They don&#8217;t see the connection between themselves and what their government does. Contact your Congress person today. mike, member of noac  see noac home
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Five Year Since Our First Action by parkerforsenate.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Richard Joseph Durbin</title>
		<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=127#comment-155536</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=127#comment-155536</guid>
					<description>[...] ^ Glauber, Bill (October 3, 2002). &#8220;War protesters gentler, but passion still burns&#8221; (paid archive). Chicago Tribune: p.&#160;1. http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/203569621.html?dids=203569621:203569621&#38;FMT=ABS&#38;FMTS=ABS:FT.&#160; Strausberg, Chinta (October 3, 2002). &#8220;War with Iraq undermines U.N.&#8221; (paid archive). Chicago Defender: p.&#160;1. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-220379051.html.&#160; Bryant, Greg (October 2, 2002). &#8220;300 protesters rally to oppose war with Iraq&#8221;. Medill News Service. http://mesh.medill.northwestern.edu/mnschicago/archives/2002/10/300_protesters.html.&#160; Katz, Marilyn (October 2, 2007). &#8220;Five Years Since Our First Action&#8221;. Chicagoans Against War &#38; Injustice. http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=127.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ^ Glauber, Bill (October 3, 2002). &#8220;War protesters gentler, but passion still burns&#8221; (paid archive). Chicago Tribune: p.&#160;1. <a href="http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/203569621.html?dids=203569621:203569621&amp;FMT=ABS&amp;FMTS=ABS:FT.&#160;" rel="nofollow">http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/access/203569621.html?dids=203569621:203569621&amp;FMT=ABS&amp;FMTS=ABS:FT.&#160;</a> Strausberg, Chinta (October 3, 2002). &#8220;War with Iraq undermines U.N.&#8221; (paid archive). Chicago Defender: p.&#160;1. <a href="http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-220379051.html.&#160;" rel="nofollow">http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-220379051.html.&#160;</a> Bryant, Greg (October 2, 2002). &#8220;300 protesters rally to oppose war with Iraq&#8221;. Medill News Service. <a href="http://mesh.medill.northwestern.edu/mnschicago/archives/2002/10/300_protesters.html.&#160;" rel="nofollow">http://mesh.medill.northwestern.edu/mnschicago/archives/2002/10/300_protesters.html.&#160;</a> Katz, Marilyn (October 2, 2007). &#8220;Five Years Since Our First Action&#8221;. Chicagoans Against War &amp; Injustice. <a href="http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=127.&#160;" rel="nofollow">http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=127.&#160;</a> [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About CAWI by Another Militant Radical Connection: Carl Davidson &#171; Ms Placed Democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?page_id=2#comment-129735</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?page_id=2#comment-129735</guid>
					<description>[...] Another Militant Radical Connection: Carl&#160;Davidson  Posted on October 8, 2008 by renaissancelady48    From The Real Barack Obama in its article, Carl Davidson Doth Protest Too Much&#8221; highlights a relationship between Carl Davidson and Obama. Davidson is the former president of the SDS, (this is important later in the article). Read on: Katz and former Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) president Carl Davidson, “two perennially engaged ’60s veterans and ex-SDS members”, Jeff Epton wrote December 15, 2003, in In These Times, were “key organizers” of the October 2, 2002, anti-war demonstration. Originating as Chicagoans Against War with Iraq (CAWI), by December 2003 CAWI had morphed into Chicagoans Against War and Injustice. Davidson explained, “as the war transformed from invasion to occupation, CAWI activists managed to avoid splits over sectarian and strategic differences, and committed to stay together and move from ‘protest to politics’.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Another Militant Radical Connection: Carl&nbsp;Davidson  Posted on October 8, 2008 by renaissancelady48    From The Real Barack Obama in its article, Carl Davidson Doth Protest Too Much&#8221; highlights a relationship between Carl Davidson and Obama. Davidson is the former president of the SDS, (this is important later in the article). Read on: Katz and former Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) president Carl Davidson, “two perennially engaged ’60s veterans and ex-SDS members”, Jeff Epton wrote December 15, 2003, in In These Times, were “key organizers” of the October 2, 2002, anti-war demonstration. Originating as Chicagoans Against War with Iraq (CAWI), by December 2003 CAWI had morphed into Chicagoans Against War and Injustice. Davidson explained, “as the war transformed from invasion to occupation, CAWI activists managed to avoid splits over sectarian and strategic differences, and committed to stay together and move from ‘protest to politics’.” [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sunni-Shia Alliance? by Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=106#comment-22909</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 05:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=106#comment-22909</guid>
					<description>This is a good article.

The British army has just killed the Mehdi Army's military chief in Bazra. So now as a consequence there is probably an even greater polarization between "government"/occupation forces and those who are uniting with Al-Sadr and demanding the invaders/occupiers leave Iraq immediately. 

Al-Sadr will need to watch out for a U.S. rocket or bomb. However, if or when he is assassinated it would mean the total collapse of the Maliki occupation government. In the scramble to fill the vacuum the Sadrist with their new united front could conceivably take power as the newly trained Iraqi forces turn on their U.S. U.K. trainers and support the will of their people. 

In the ensuing stand-off U.S troops could be held as "hostages" by the men they trained and advised. Large numbers of such "hostages" might be the only thing to stop the U.S. from bombing the "mutinous" Iraqis. If the Iraqi people want the U.S. to leave, which seems to be the case, then of course the Iraqi troops would too.
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good article.</p>
<p>The British army has just killed the Mehdi Army&#8217;s military chief in Bazra. So now as a consequence there is probably an even greater polarization between &#8220;government&#8221;/occupation forces and those who are uniting with Al-Sadr and demanding the invaders/occupiers leave Iraq immediately. </p>
<p>Al-Sadr will need to watch out for a U.S. rocket or bomb. However, if or when he is assassinated it would mean the total collapse of the Maliki occupation government. In the scramble to fill the vacuum the Sadrist with their new united front could conceivably take power as the newly trained Iraqi forces turn on their U.S. U.K. trainers and support the will of their people. </p>
<p>In the ensuing stand-off U.S troops could be held as &#8220;hostages&#8221; by the men they trained and advised. Large numbers of such &#8220;hostages&#8221; might be the only thing to stop the U.S. from bombing the &#8220;mutinous&#8221; Iraqis. If the Iraqi people want the U.S. to leave, which seems to be the case, then of course the Iraqi troops would too.<br />
.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Private Armies! by Doug Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=104#comment-20393</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 03:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=104#comment-20393</guid>
					<description>You might be interested in the industry perspective on these hearings:

"Best Supported, Best Supplied Military Operation in History"

House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Defense

Key points from the International Peace Operations Association (IPOA)

10 May 2007

While IPOA appreciates the interest that Congress is showing on the issue of contractors providing services in Iraq, we regret that we were not offered the opportunity to testify today to provide balance and an industry perspective on these critical issues. There is much that can be improved in government contracting, and IPOA has been at the fore with ideas and suggestions to improve private sector support for international peace and stability operations. While corrections and improvements are important, we should not lose sight of the fact that the innovative and cost effective use of contractors has ensured that the U.S. military operation in Iraq is the best supported and supplied in military history.

Contractors are not new actors in stability operations and areas of conflict. For example, the United States had 80,000 contractors in Vietnam at one point, and that is despite the fact that the Cold War era military did far more of its own logistics and support. Furthermore, because we are going to be working with contractors in the future as well, the question is not whether we should use contractors, but how we can use them better. 

A few key points:

1. It is due to the private sector that our operations in Iraq are the best supported and supplied in history. Our military is better able to focus on their core missions and leave the ancillary tasks to professional contractors.

2. The reason we contract services to the private sector instead of utilizing the military is because it significantly reduces the burden and strain on our soldiers in the field. The private sector offers enormous surge capacity, a reservoir of professional capabilities, and huge cost savings. 

3. Civilian contractors doing the military support, reconstruction, and security in Iraq are overwhelmingly Iraqis, the people who should be leading such efforts in Iraq. Americans make up only 17 % of Department of Defense contractors, something critics prefer to overlook.

4. Good oversight and accountability are good for good companies. While oversight has improved since 2003, overwhelmed contract officers have had a detrimental effect on the private sector's ability to fulfill their contracts. In terms of accountability, companies can and are frequently held accountable through standard contractual methods. For individuals, there are a number of laws on the books, including the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA), which can be used to try contractors in Federal courts. As a trade association, we believe these laws could be more energetically enforced by the Department of Justice.

5. The U.S. military is designed to be the most capable organization in the world, it is not designed or expected to be particularly cost effective. Outsourcing needs to the private sector brings huge economies of scale and efficiencies that save billions of dollars while reducing burdens and enhancing services to the soldiers in the field.

6. Critics of civilian contractors need to articulate alternatives. Not just for U.S. operations, but for UN and Africa Union peace operations, which rely on contractors for critical services as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be interested in the industry perspective on these hearings:</p>
<p>&#8220;Best Supported, Best Supplied Military Operation in History&#8221;</p>
<p>House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Defense</p>
<p>Key points from the International Peace Operations Association (IPOA)</p>
<p>10 May 2007</p>
<p>While IPOA appreciates the interest that Congress is showing on the issue of contractors providing services in Iraq, we regret that we were not offered the opportunity to testify today to provide balance and an industry perspective on these critical issues. There is much that can be improved in government contracting, and IPOA has been at the fore with ideas and suggestions to improve private sector support for international peace and stability operations. While corrections and improvements are important, we should not lose sight of the fact that the innovative and cost effective use of contractors has ensured that the U.S. military operation in Iraq is the best supported and supplied in military history.</p>
<p>Contractors are not new actors in stability operations and areas of conflict. For example, the United States had 80,000 contractors in Vietnam at one point, and that is despite the fact that the Cold War era military did far more of its own logistics and support. Furthermore, because we are going to be working with contractors in the future as well, the question is not whether we should use contractors, but how we can use them better. </p>
<p>A few key points:</p>
<p>1. It is due to the private sector that our operations in Iraq are the best supported and supplied in history. Our military is better able to focus on their core missions and leave the ancillary tasks to professional contractors.</p>
<p>2. The reason we contract services to the private sector instead of utilizing the military is because it significantly reduces the burden and strain on our soldiers in the field. The private sector offers enormous surge capacity, a reservoir of professional capabilities, and huge cost savings. </p>
<p>3. Civilian contractors doing the military support, reconstruction, and security in Iraq are overwhelmingly Iraqis, the people who should be leading such efforts in Iraq. Americans make up only 17 % of Department of Defense contractors, something critics prefer to overlook.</p>
<p>4. Good oversight and accountability are good for good companies. While oversight has improved since 2003, overwhelmed contract officers have had a detrimental effect on the private sector&#8217;s ability to fulfill their contracts. In terms of accountability, companies can and are frequently held accountable through standard contractual methods. For individuals, there are a number of laws on the books, including the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA), which can be used to try contractors in Federal courts. As a trade association, we believe these laws could be more energetically enforced by the Department of Justice.</p>
<p>5. The U.S. military is designed to be the most capable organization in the world, it is not designed or expected to be particularly cost effective. Outsourcing needs to the private sector brings huge economies of scale and efficiencies that save billions of dollars while reducing burdens and enhancing services to the soldiers in the field.</p>
<p>6. Critics of civilian contractors need to articulate alternatives. Not just for U.S. operations, but for UN and Africa Union peace operations, which rely on contractors for critical services as well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protest the Veto on May 2 by Mario F. Penalver</title>
		<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=99#comment-19473</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 05:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=99#comment-19473</guid>
					<description>Dear Carl,

Your name came up at a WCW-Chicago planning meeting for the march I am leading from Chicago to DC in June. I would like to speak to you, and specifically regarding ways in which CAWI can support it.

Please respond at your earliest convenience.

-Mario Penalver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Carl,</p>
<p>Your name came up at a WCW-Chicago planning meeting for the march I am leading from Chicago to DC in June. I would like to speak to you, and specifically regarding ways in which CAWI can support it.</p>
<p>Please respond at your earliest convenience.</p>
<p>-Mario Penalver
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Unionists Blast &#8216;Blood for Oil&#8217; by Margarita Keeferstein</title>
		<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=96#comment-11926</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=96#comment-11926</guid>
					<description>Is there any truth to some American GIs signaling that if they die in Iraq that they desire to have their remains (ashes) dropped or spread on President Bush's Texas ranch or personally delivered to him by a family member? I've heard that the thinking is, he had them killed therefore he owns them. The thinking behind this is that it will embarrass the president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any truth to some American GIs signaling that if they die in Iraq that they desire to have their remains (ashes) dropped or spread on President Bush&#8217;s Texas ranch or personally delivered to him by a family member? I&#8217;ve heard that the thinking is, he had them killed therefore he owns them. The thinking behind this is that it will embarrass the president.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Three Articles on the Jan 27 March by Gordon Soderberg</title>
		<link>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=76#comment-718</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?p=76#comment-718</guid>
					<description>
By Alan Graf

&lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=hippielawyer" rel="nofollow"&gt;Third Planet Report--Voices&lt;/a&gt; from the streets of Washington DC Peace March January 27, 2007 including an electrifying interview with former 27 year old CIA analyst Ray McGovern--an insider's view of Bates, Cheney and Bush. Also Interviewed were members of Farms Not Arms, New Orleans Voices For Peace, Iraq Veterans Against the War, Courage to Resist, and Code Pink and citizens and residence of the Untied States.

Remembering New Orleans.

By Gordon Soderberg

I've been in and around New Orleans since September, 2nd, 2005. I documented thousands of stories about Red Cross, FEMA, Blackwater, National Guard, the Insurance industry and their bureaucratic responce to hurricanes katrina and Rita. It was a natural disaster turned into a military action for a economic boom for some private contractors like Halliburton, Blackwater and Greyhound, and a bust for most everyone else. The everyone else being those that were forced from their homes at gun point by the national guard or Blackwater, seperated from family members and shipped to different states. Those that did not get put on buses were slowly starved out of their communities for a lack of water and food by the Red Cross. 

For the last 17 months, the government has seperated family members and systematically displaced over 1,000,000 citzens of the United States without any plan to reunite them back in their communities. 

This plantation mantallity must change! 

I will never forget what the federal, state, and local police officials did to the people they swore an oath to serve. But I will never forgive those that swore a oath to remain independent of governement influence when providing relief. The Red Cross should stick to securing the blood supply and turn the keys to relief work over to the Department of Peace and Relief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Alan Graf</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=hippielawyer" rel="nofollow">Third Planet Report&#8211;Voices</a> from the streets of Washington DC Peace March January 27, 2007 including an electrifying interview with former 27 year old CIA analyst Ray McGovern&#8211;an insider&#8217;s view of Bates, Cheney and Bush. Also Interviewed were members of Farms Not Arms, New Orleans Voices For Peace, Iraq Veterans Against the War, Courage to Resist, and Code Pink and citizens and residence of the Untied States.</p>
<p>Remembering New Orleans.</p>
<p>By Gordon Soderberg</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been in and around New Orleans since September, 2nd, 2005. I documented thousands of stories about Red Cross, FEMA, Blackwater, National Guard, the Insurance industry and their bureaucratic responce to hurricanes katrina and Rita. It was a natural disaster turned into a military action for a economic boom for some private contractors like Halliburton, Blackwater and Greyhound, and a bust for most everyone else. The everyone else being those that were forced from their homes at gun point by the national guard or Blackwater, seperated from family members and shipped to different states. Those that did not get put on buses were slowly starved out of their communities for a lack of water and food by the Red Cross. </p>
<p>For the last 17 months, the government has seperated family members and systematically displaced over 1,000,000 citzens of the United States without any plan to reunite them back in their communities. </p>
<p>This plantation mantallity must change! </p>
<p>I will never forget what the federal, state, and local police officials did to the people they swore an oath to serve. But I will never forgive those that swore a oath to remain independent of governement influence when providing relief. The Red Cross should stick to securing the blood supply and turn the keys to relief work over to the Department of Peace and Relief.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
